building is a biological process. building is not an aesthetic process.
these are the only motives when building a house: sex life, sleeping habits, pets, gardening, personal hygiene, weather protection, hygiene in the home, car maintenance, cooking, heating, exposure to the sun, service.
we explore the relationships of the house and its occupants to the world outside.
we explore the relationships of human beings and animals to the garden, and the interrelationships between human beings, pets, and domestic insects. we determine the annual fluctuations in the temperature of the ground and from that calculate the heat loss of the floor and the resulting depth required for the foundation blocks. the geological nature of the soil informs us about its capillary capability and determines whether water will naturally drain away or whether drains are required. we calculate the angle of the sun's incidence during the course of the year according to the latitude of the site. with that information we determine the size of the shadow cast by the house on the garden and the amount of sun admitted by the window into the bedroom. we estimate the amount of daylight available for interior working areas. we compare the heat conductivity of the outside walls with the humidity of the air outside the house. we already know about the circulation of air in a heated room. the visual and acoustical relationships to neighboring dwellings are most carefully considered. we include in our calculation the amount of light reflection [paint] offers. we avoid using purely white finish on the house. we consider the body of the house to be an accumulator of the sun's warmth…
the modernness of such an estate does not consist of a flat roof and horizontal-vertical arrangement of the façade, but rather in its direct relationship to human existence. in it we have given thoughtful consideration to the tensions of the individual, the sexes, the neighborhood and the community, as well as to geophysical relationships. building is the deliberate organization of the processes of life.

7 comments:
that is a wonderful diagram.
This is an excellent excerpt. However, no one should find Meyer's interest in the conditions of living to be a surprise.
Best known for removal as head of the Bauhaus for his Communist sympathies, Meyer produced a number of designs during this time which examined human ecologies.
His drawings, some of which were on display in the recent MoMA Bauhaus exhibition, are meticulous and constantly include solar orientation site studies. These functional concern were everpresent in his work.
It should come as no surprise that, like Mies, he was trained in masonry. He also was friends with El Lissitzky and the early Supremetists.
On this note, I would highly recommend reading the book "Russia: An Architecture For World Revolution" by El Lissitzky.
There are many similarities to Meyer's Building. Both examine how humans could be freed through a creation of functional forms. Today we often consider functionalism through its capitalistic vein, determined by budgetary confines.
Meyer and Lissitzky both suggest the functionalism is something radically different. Functionalism is an empowered ontological state made possibe through better relationships between the individual and the larger world. Social, habitual, and environmental engagements are each critical parts of this world which they desired to connect to.
Actually that is not a diagram at all as by definition a diagram communicates information. This is more of a poorly conceived pictogram, as it does no more than vaguely suggest a loose concept...which is alarmingly appropriate in the context of this blog.
Gabriel do you remember if the ADGB Trade Union School had been renovated by the time we toured it? I remember the glass block having been restored in the cafeteria at that time.
This Architectural Record article says it reopened in January 2008, but we were there sometime in Spring 2007, right? It must have been mostly completed by then.
http://archrecord.construction.com/news/daily/archives/080813germany.asp
To Anonymous:
I suggest you take your virulence elsewhere.
Critical comments are encouraged, and if you have something more to say about the content, say it. There is no room for silly jibes here.
-wg
Interesting article and scheme!..
I wrote an article bout another aspect of Meyer'precept.
Could you imagine Hannes Meyer out of his ideology?
Post a Comment